NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre

Enabling translational research through partnership

MENUMENU
  • About
    • About the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
    • Activities during COVID-19
    • Strategic Partnership Board
    • Steering Committee
    • Promoting Equality, Diversity and Inclusion in Research
    • Current Vacancies
    • Contact Us
    • Stay in Touch
  • Research

        • Research Overview
        • Clinical Research Facility
        • 15 Research Themes

        • Cancer
        • Cardiovascular Medicine
        • Digital Health from Hospital to Home
        • Gene and Cell Therapy
        • Genomic Medicine
        • Imaging
        • Inflammation across Tissues
        • Life-saving Vaccines
        • Metabolic Experimental Medicine
        • Modernising Medical Microbiology and Big Infection Diagnostics
        • Musculoskeletal
        • Preventive Neurology
        • Respiratory Medicine
        • Surgical Innovation, Technology and Evaluation
        • Translational Data Science
  • Patient & Public Involvement
    • Getting involved with research
    • View and register for involvement opportunities
    • Patient & Public Groups
    • Patient and Public Involvement Advisory Group
    • Diversity in Research Group
    • Oxford Blood Group
    • Case Studies
    • PPIE Strategy
    • PPIE News
    • PPI Researcher Guidance
    • Researchers: Post a PPIE opportunity
  • Training Hub
    • Training Hub Overview
    • Clinical Academic Pathway
    • Internships
    • Preparatory Research Fellowships
    • Senior Research Fellowships
    • Research Training Bursaries
    • Doctoral Awards
    • Post-Doctoral Awards
    • Other funding
    • Leadership Training
    • Useful Links
    • Training and Education Resources
    • Upcoming Training Events & Courses
  • Industry
    • Collaborate with Oxford BRC
    • Who Do We Work With?
    • Events
    • Further Information and Additional Resources
    • Contacts for Industry
  • Videos
  • News
  • Events

News

You are here: Home > Obesity, Diet and Lifestyle > Environmental impact of 57,000 multi-ingredient processed foods revealed for first time

Environmental impact of 57,000 multi-ingredient processed foods revealed for first time

9 August 2022 · Listed under Obesity, Diet and Lifestyle

New analysis provides a first step towards enabling consumers, retailers, and policymakers to make informed decisions on the environmental impacts of multi-ingredient food and drink products.

Shutterstock.com

Recent surveys indicate that over half of UK consumers want to make their diets more sustainable, and increasing numbers of food companies are setting ambitious net zero greenhouse gas targets. However, reducing the environmental footprint of foods is hindered by the lack of detailed environmental impact information, particularly for food products containing multiple ingredients.

To address this, researchers at Oxford Population Health, supported by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), have contributed to a study which combined different environmental impacts into a standardised score for the majority of individual food and drink products for sale in UK supermarkets.

The research, published in PNASthis week, is part of the University of Oxford’s Livestock, Environment and People (LEAP) programme, which aims to provide evidence and tools for decision makers to promote healthy and sustainable diets.

The researchers used publicly available information to estimate the environmental impact of 57,000 food products, based on greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water stress, and potential for eutrophication, when bodies of water become enriched with nutrients, often causing harmful algal blooms.

For multi-ingredient products, each individual ingredient was mapped to environmental databases. The team developed an algorithm that estimated the percentages of all ingredients within each food, and these were used to estimate the overall impact of the whole product.

Key findings:

  • Multi-ingredient products made of fruits, vegetables, sugar, and flour (such as soups, salads, bread, and many breakfast cereals) had low impact scores, whilst those made of meat, fish, and cheese were at the high end of the scale.
  • Jerky, biltong, and other dried beef products (which typically have more than 100g of fresh meat per 100g of final product) had some of the highest environmental impacts.
  • Many meat-alternative products (such as plant-based sausages or burgers) had a fifth to less than a tenth of the environmental impact of meat-based equivalents.
  • When comparing the environmental impact score to their nutritional value (as defined by the colour-coded the Nutri-Score method), products that were more sustainable tended to be more nutritious, including meat and meat alternatives. There were exceptions to this trend, such as sugary beverages, which had a low environmental impact but also score poorly for nutritional quality.

According to the researchers, this type of information, if communicated to consumers and retailers, may help shift behaviours towards more sustainable foods both by reformulation of products, and by guiding consumers towards lower impact products.

The analysis made use of foodDB – a big data research platform at Oxford Population Health that collects and processes data daily on all food and drink products available in twelve online supermarkets in the UK and Ireland, and a comprehensive review of 570 studies of the environmental impact of food production, which includes data from 38,000 farms in 119 countries.

Dr Richie Harrington, of Oxford Population Health is senior author for the paper and lead researcher for foodDB. He said: “Our method fills an information gap on the environmental impacts of multi-ingredient foods. The algorithms we developed can estimate the percentage contribution of each individual ingredient within a product and match those ingredients to existing environmental impact databases. We have illustrated how this can be used to derive quantifiable insight on the sustainability of food products, and their relationship to their nutritional quality.”

Professor Pete Scarborough, also of Oxford Population Health and a contributing author on the study, added: “For the first time we have a transparent and comparable method for assessing the environmental footprint of multi-ingredient processed foods. This could support tools that help consumers make more environmentally sustainable food purchasing decisions. More importantly, it could prompt retailers and food manufacturers to reduce the environmental impact of the food supply thereby making it easier for all of us to have healthier, more sustainable diets.”

← OUH dietitian accepted onto NIHR pre-doctoral fellowship

Other news

News Categories

News by Month

See all news

Subscribe to the Oxford BRC Newsletter

Keep informed about the work of the Oxford BRC by subscribing to our Mailchimp e-newsletter. It is produced several times a year and delivers news and information about upcoming events straight to your inbox.

Subscribe Now

Oxford BRC on Social Media

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Feedback

We’d love to hear your feedback. Please contact us at obrcenquiries@ouh.nhs.uk

  • Data Control and Privacy
  • Accessibility
  • Our Partners
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact

Copyright © 2023 NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre